Ty Bomba - 10:22am Oct 8, 1999 PST (#2318 of 2451) (1) In 6.3, the rule states that disrupted units that leave an enemy zone of control cannot renter any EZOC during the same movement phase. Can I presume that disrupted units which do not START in an EZOC also cannot enter any EZOC during its movement phase? 1 Answer: Disrupted units that start their movement phase outside an EZOC can enter an EZOC -- please see 8.3 for the effects of disruption. (2) In the 5.5 general description of the combat phase, it states that all enemy units ADJACENT to your units must be attacked. However in 6.4 and 9.1, the rules state that only units IN AN EZOC must attack, and conversely, all enemy units in your unit's ZOC must be attacked. Which is the correct rule? This is a confusing issue with rspect to disrupted units, because they do not exert zones of control. 2- Answer: With the exception of the wagon laager unit, which never attacks, rule 5.5 states the case most fully: "...all units then found to be adjacent to one or more enemy units across playable hexsides must be attacked by at least one of those units..." (3) Presuming that only ZOC's (rather than adjacency) make combat mandatory, what happens in the case of a disrupted unit being adjacent to an enemy disrupted unit? Is combat VOLUNTARY? Or is it disallowed? That is, a disrupted unit unit is obligated to attack only through the pressure of an enemy ZOC exerted by an undisrupted enemy unit. In the face of a disrupted enemy unit, a disrupted friendly unit does not have the discipline to attack the enemy unit voluntarily. 3- Answer: Please see the answer to number 2 above; that should clear up number 3's answer for you.