>Cremona, >I'll try to answer your questions on the games I designed. The other I >can't help you with, I've never played it. > >Rob Markham > >>>(A) - CROSSBOW AND CANNON >>> >>>(1) - MORALE : when a combat unit receive a STEP LOSS by missile units the >>modified morale value is immediately applied in the following melee ? >Yes >>>(2) - PALIZADE : the -2 bonus is only for the defenders or also for the >>attackers (during the defensive fire) , if BOTH are adiacent to the palizade ? >Both >>>(3) - FORTS : Cavalry and Pikes cannot pass trough forts. OK, but this rule >>also applies ALONG MAJOR ROADS that cross those forts? >The rule is correct, they may not cross those forts. >>>(4) - LEADERS stacked with with a combat unit that ROUTS during the >>defensive fire remain in place or follow the reatreating unit ? >Either, the owning player has the option (I would suggest the leader in >almost all cases follow the retreating unit). >>>(5) - STAND COMMAND : a unit that retreat ONE HEX maintainthe original >>>facing ? >Yes >>> >>>(B) - AGE OF CHIVALRY >>> >>>(6) - If a combat unit has an ATTACK COMMAND and is adjacent to an opposite >>combat unit BUT NOT in its ZOC, can attack a different unit ? >Not if it means moving away from the adjacent enemy unit. >>>(7) - If ONLY ONE unit of a group that attacks is CAVALRY , does the group >>receive the CHARGE BONUS ? >Yes >>>(8) - Same question but with BERSERK units. >Yes again. >>>(9) - In other words, attacks with different kinds of units how are counted ? >Attacker's advantage. >>>(10)- And if a unit is attacked from the FRONT and the BACK, which >>bonus/malus apply ? >Again, use the best for the attacker. >>>(11) - BATTLE OF LINCOLN : were is thet DAMNED HEX "F" (starting point NOT >>printed on my map) ? >3609 >>>Those games are really nice and it is a pity that they are so difficult to >>play only because they have some "holes" in the rules : anyone knows if >>there is an edition of the rules (published in one of the late games) that >>can be applied to ALL of them ? (Is this is possible, of course). >Right now, the answer is no, but I have been approached about rewrting the >rules to some of these games so that they include the errata and are less >nebulous. One thing that would help is a standard rule booklet that covers >the basic system and then separate game booklets that would detail >differences in each of the quads (something K.P. never wanted to do). >Perhaps in a year or so. > >Good luck, and I'd be happy to answer any other questions if I can. > >Rob > > > ******************************** * Pietro Cremona * "Old hand" Wargamer * Cesena (FO) - ITALY * E-Mail : asterix@linknet.it * Phone : ++ 39 547-335121 ********************************